Dersin Adı

Kodu

Normal Yarıyılı

Kredisi

AKTS

(ECTS)

Teorik

3

Uygulama

–

Türk Dış Politikasında Kriz Yönetimi ve Zorlayıcı Diplomasi

SBU6106

Güz / Bahar

3

7,5

Laboratuar (Saat/Hafta)

–

Dersin Dili

Türkçe

Dersin Türü

Seçimlik

Dersin Koordinatörü

Doç. Dr. Fuat Aksu

Dersin İçeriği

Bu derste Kriz Yönetimi kavramları ve yöntemlerine ilişkin kavramsal tartışmalar ekseninde Türkiye’nin dış politika tarihindeki örnek krizler ele alınarak incelenecektir. Bu çerçevede dış politika karar alma süreçleri, kurumsal işbirliği süreçleri irdelenerek kuvvet kullanma tehdidinden yararlanılarak çözülen krizler zorlayıcı diplomasi stratejisi ile açıklanmaya çalışılacaktır.

Dersin Amacı

Kriz Yönetimi, Zorlayıcı Diplomasi stratejisi kavramlarından yararlanarak Türkiye’de dış politika karar alma sürecini örnekler üzerinden analiz etmek

Dersin Kazandıracağı

Bilgi ve Beceriler

Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Anabilim Dalı öğrencilerine Türkiye’de dış politika krizlerinde nasıl bir karar alma ve uygulama sürecinin işlediği hakkında bilgi vererek dış politika tarihi içerisinde yaşanmış olan krizlere analitik bir yaklaşımla bakabilme becerisi kazandırmak.

Ders Kitabı (Notu)

Fuat Aksu, Türk Dış Politikasında Zorlayıcı Diplomasi, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 2008

Yararlanılacak Diğer Kaynaklar
Brecher, Michael  and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. A Study of Crisis. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
Brecher, Michael,  Patrick James.  “Patterns of Crisis Management”.  The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 32. no. 3 (Sep., 1988): 426-456.

Craig, Gordon – A. George, Alexander L.. Güç ve Devlet Yönetimi: Günümüzün Diplomatik Sorunları. Ankara: Dış Politika Enstitüsü, 1997.

Devlen, Balkan, Özgür Özdamar. “Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Crises”. Rethinking Realism in International Relations. Annette Freyberg, Inan Ewan Harrıson, Patrıck James (Ed.) . Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009: 136-164.
George, Alexander L.. “Inadvertent Wars-Introduction”. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management, Alexander George (Ed.) . USA: Westview Press, 1991: 31-36.
George, Alexander L.  “A Provisional Theory of Crisis Management”.  Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Alexander. L. George. (ed.)    Westview Press, 1991: 22-30.

George, Alexander L.  “Is Research On Crisis Management Needed?”. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management.   Alexander. L. George (Ed.). Westview Press, 1991:3-6.

George, Alexander L.  “Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History”. International Security. vol. 22, no. 1 (Summer, 1997): 44-52.

George, Alexander L.  “Strategies for Crisis Management”.  Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Alexander. L. George, (ed.),  Westview Press, 1991:379-383
George, Alexander L.  “The Impact of Crisis-Induced Stress on Decision Making”.  Eds. Solomon, F. and Marston, R. Q., The Medical Implications of Nuclear War, Washington: National Academies,1986: 529-554
George, Alexander L.  “The Tension Between Military Logic and Requirements of Diplomacy in Crisis Management”. Ed. Alexander. L. George. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Westview Press, 1991: 13-21.
George, Alexander L.  “Theory and Practise”. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy Laos, Cuba, Vietnam,Alexander L. George, David K. Hall, and William R. (ed.), Little, Brown and Company, 1971:13-23.
George, Alexander, L. and William E. Simons, “Findings And Conclusions”. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy Laos, Cuba, Vietnam. Alexander L. George, David K. Hall, and William R. (eds.). Little, Brown and Company, 1971: 267-294.
Gideon, Rose. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”. World Politics. vol. 51. no. 1 (Oct., 1998) :144-172.

George, Alexander L.. (ed.). Savaştan Kaçınmak. 3 Cilt. İstanbul: Nesa Yayınları, 2006.

George, Alexander. L. Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy, Washington: US IPE,1998.

George, Alexander L.. “Coercive Diplomacy: Definition and Characteristics”. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy. Alexander L. George and William E. Simons (eds.). Boulder: Westview Pres, 1994. pp. 7-11.

George, Alexander L.. “Coercive Diplomacy”. The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics. 6th Ed.. Robert J. Art and Kennetz N. Waltz (eds.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub., 2004. pp. 70-76.

George, Alexander L.. Forceful Persuation: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington: United States Instute of Peace, 1997.

Robert J. Art, “Coercive Diplomacy: What Do We Know”, The United States and Coercive Diplomacy, Robert J. Art and patrick M. Gronin (eds.), Washington: USIP, 2003,

Schelling, Thomas C.. Arms and influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.

Sperandei, Maria. “Bridging Deterrence and Compellence: An Alternative Approach to the Study of Coercive Diplomacy”. International Studies Review. 2006. 8. s. 253-280.

Strüchler, Nikolas. The Threat of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Toluner, Sevin. Milletlerarası Hukuk Açısından Türkiye’nin Sorunları. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları, 2004.

Mintz , Alex and Karl DeRouen Jr. Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making, Cambridge: University Press, 2010.

 

 

Ön Koşul Dersleri

–

Ön Koşul Konuları

–

Ödev ve Projeler

Her öğrenci dönem boyunca en az bir seminer ödevi hazırlamak, sunmak ve makale formatında tesli etmekle yükümlüdür. Seminer ödevi ders içeriğine özgü olarak kavramsal ve/ya olay analizi şeklinde olabilir.

 

Laboratuar Deneyleri

–

Bilgisayar Kullanımı

–

Diğer Uygulamalar

–

 

 

Başarı Değerlendirme

Sistemi

 

Adedi

Etki Oranı %

Ara Sınavlar

 

 

Kısa Sınavlar

 

 

Ödevler

 

 

Projeler

 

 

Dönem Ödevi

1

100

Laboratuar

 

 

Diğer

 

 

Final Sınavı

 

 

Ders Gruplarına Göre

Ders Kredisinin Dağılımı,

%

Temel Bilimler

 

Mesleki

 

Diğer

 

 

Hafta

Konular

1

Dış Politika ve Kavramsal Tartışmalar

2

Kriz Yönetimi

3

Zorlayıcı Diplomasi Stratejisi

4

Kriz Türleri ve Analiz Süreçleri

5

Türkiye’de Dış Politika Karar Alma Süreci

6

Türk Dış Politika Tarihinde Dış Politika Krizleri

7

1945 SSCB-Türkiye Krizi

8

1963-1964 Kıbrıs Krizi

9

1967 Kıbrıs Krizi

10

1974 Kıbrıs Krizi

11

1987 Ege Krizi

12

1989 Bulgaristan Krizi

13

1996 Kardak Krizi

14

1997 S-300 Füzeleri Krizi

15

1998 Öcalan-Suriye Krizi

 

Genel Açıklama:

 

Seminer ödevleri ders kayıtlı öğrencilerin kendi ilgi ve beklentilerine uygun olarak yapacakları öneriler çerçevesinde ilk haftalarda şekillenir. Okuma ve tartışma süreçleri sırasında hazırlanan taslak ödevler ders yürütücüsüne teslim edilerek değerlendirilmesi sağlanır, düzeltme önerileriyle şekillenen metin ilgili öğrenci tarafından sunularak tartışmaya açılır. Eleştirilen ve tartışılan metin akademik yazım usullerine uyun olarak hazırlandıktan sonra nihai değerlendirmesi ve başarı ölçümü için ders yürütücüsüne teslim edilir. 

Derslere düzenli devam edilmesi hem tartışmalar hem de hazırlanacak metinler açısından önemlidir.

 

 

 

 

Taslak Ek Kaynaklar…

 

  • Ahrari, Mohammed E. “A Paradigm of ‘Crisis’ Decision Making: The Case of Synfuels”. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 17, No. 1 (Jan., 1987):71-91.
  • Aksu,  Fuat. “Kuvvet Kullanma Tehditine Dayalı Dış Politika Krizlerinde Güvenlik Kavramı”. Türkiye’de Ordu, Devlet ve Güvenlik  Siyaseti. der. Evren Balta Paker, İsmet Akça. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2010: 475-502.
  • Aksu, Fuat. Türk Dış Politikasında Zorlayıcı Diplomasi. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 2008.
  • Aksu, Fuat. Türk-Yunan İlişkileri. Ankara: Stratejik Araştırma ve Etüdler Milli Komitesi (SAEMK), 2001.
  • Algosaibi, Ghazi A.R. “The Theory of International Relations: Hans J. Morgenthau and His Critics”. Background. Vol. 8 , (Feb., 1965): 221-256.
  • Allison, Graham and Zelikow, Philip. Essence of Decision: Explaining Cuban Missle Crisis. New York: Longman, 1999.
  • Aydın, Mustafa. “Uluslararası İlişkiler’de Yaklaşım, Teori ve Analiz”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. c. 51. s. 1 (1996): 71-114.
  • Aydın, Mustafa. “Uluslararası İlişkilerin “Gerçekçi” Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği”, Uluslararası İlişkiler. c.1. s. 1 (Bahar, 2004): 33-66.
  • Baldwin, David Allen. Economic Statecraft. Princeton University Press, 1985.
  • Bercovitch, Jacob,  Victor Kremenyuk, I. William Zartman. “Introduction : The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution”.  The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution. eds. Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk and I. William Zartman. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013:1-11.
  • Booth, Ken. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice”,  International Affairs, vol. 67. no.3 (Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991): 527-545.
  • Brecher, Michael  and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. A Study of Crisis. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
  • Brecher, Michael,  Patrick James.  “Patterns of Crisis Management”.  The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 32. no. 3 (Sep., 1988): 426-456.
  • Brecher, Michael. “Toward a Theory of International Crisis Behavior: A Preliminary Report”.  International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 21, No. 1, Special Issue on International Crisis: Progress and Prospects for Applied Forecasting and Management (Mar., 1977): 39-74.
  • Brecher, Michael. Crisis in World Politics: Theory and Reality. Pergamon Press,1993.
  • Brecher, Michael. Decision in Crisis Israel, 1967 and 1973. London: University Of California Press,1980.
  • Brecher, Michael. International Political Earthquakes. The University of Michigan Press, 2008.
  • Breuning,  Marijke. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, November 2007.
  • Brigg, Morgan. The New Politics of Conflict Resolution: Responding to Difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  • Brown, Chris and Ainley, Kirsten. Uluslararası İlişkileri Anlamak. İstanbul: Yayınodası Yayınları, 2006.
  • Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Londra: Macmillan, 1977.
  • Burchill, Scott ve diğerleri, Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 
  • Burcu Bostanoğlu. Türkiye-ABD İlişkilerinin Politikası. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 2008.
  • Burton, John. W.. Conflict Resolution as a Political System. George Mason University Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, 1993.
  • Caprioli, Mary, “Gendered Conflict”. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 37. No. 1 (Jan., 2000): 51-68.
  • Caprioli, Mary, and Mark A. Boyer.  “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 45. no. 4 (Aug, 2001): 503-518.
  • Carr, Edward. H.. Yirmi Yıl Krizi 1919-1939. çev. Can Cemgil, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2010.
  • Checkel, Jeffrey T.  “Contructivism and Foreign Policy”, Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors and Cases. ed. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield ve Tim Dunne Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2008). 
  • Copeland, Dale C.  “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism, A Review Essay”. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. ed. Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander.  Routledge, 2006:2-33.
  • Craig, G. A. and George, A. L.. Güç ve Devlet Yönetimi: Günümüzün Diplomatik Sorunları. çev. İhsan Dağı ve Emir Yüksel. Ankara: Dış Politika Enstitüsü, 1997.
  • Dayton, Bruce W. “Managing Crisis in The Twenty- First Century”. International Studies Review. vol.6 Issue 1(March,2004):165-194.
  • Denny,  Roy. “Neorealism and Kant: No Pacific Union”. Journal of Peace Research. vol. 30. no. 4 (November, 1993): 451-454.
  • Devlen,  Balkan. Renegade Regimes and Foreign Policy Crisis. VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K., 2008.
  • Devlen, Balkan ve Özgür Özdamar. “Neoclasiccal Realism and Foreign Policy Crisis”. Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. eds. A.Freyberg-Inan, E.Harrison and P.James. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009:136-164.
  • Devlen, Balkan, Özgür Özdamar.  “Uluslararası İlişkilerde İngiliz Okulu Kuramı: Kökenleri, Kavramları ve Tartışmaları”. Uluslararası İlişkiler. c.7. s.25 (2010): 43-68.
  • Dixon, William J. .“Third­Party  Techniques  For  Preventing  Conflict  Escalation  And  Promoting  Peaceful Settlement”. International Organization. vol. 50. Issue 04. (1996): 653-681.
  • Donnelly, Jack. “Realism”. Theories of International Relations. Ed. Burchill ve diğ. New York:  Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • Doyle, M. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New                        York: W W Norton & Co Inc, 1997.
  • Doyle, Michael. “Liberalism and World Politics.” The American Political Science Review. vol. 100. No. 4. Thematic Issue on the Evolution of Political Science, in Recognition of the Centennial of the Review 80 (November, 2006): 1151-1169.
  • Dueck, Colin. “Neoclassical Realism And The National Interest: Presidents, Domestic Politics, and Major Military Interventions”. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 139-170.
  • Duelfer, Charles A.. Stephen Benedict Dyson.  “Chronic Misperception and International Conflict The U.S.-Iraq Experience”. International Security. vol. 36, No. 1. (Summer 2011):73-100.
  • Efegil, Ertan. Dış Politika Analizi Ders Notları. Ankara: Noble, 2012.
  • Forde, Steven. “International Realism and the Science of Politics: Thucydides, Machiavelli and Neorealism”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 39, no. 2 (June 1995): 141-160.
  • Fox, William T.R. “E.H. Carr and Political Realism: Vision and Revision,” Review of International Studies, s.11, 1985: 1-16.
  • George, Alexander L.  and Timothy J. McKeown. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision-Making”. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations. Vol. 2. ed. Robert Coulam and Richard Smith. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1985: 21-52.
  • George, Alexander L.. “Inadvertent Wars-Introduction”. Avoiding War. Ed. Alexander George. USA: Westwiev Press, 1991: 31-36.
  • George, Alexander L.  “A Provisional Theory of Crisis Management”.  ed.  Alexander. L. George. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Westview Press, 1991: 22-30.
  • George, Alexander L.  “Is Research On Crisis Management Needed?”. Ed.  Alexander. L. George. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Westview Press, 1991:3-6.
  • George, Alexander L.  “Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History”. International Security. vol. 22, no. 1 (Summer, 1997): 44-52.
  • George, Alexander L.  “Strategies for Crisis Management”. ed.  Alexander. L. George, Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Westview Press, 1991:379-383
  • George, Alexander L.  “The Impact of Crisis-Induced Stress on Decision Making”.  Eds. Solomon, F. and Marston, R. Q., The Medical Implications of Nuclear War, Washington: National Academies,1986: 529-554
  • George, Alexander L.  “The Tension Between Military Logic and Requirements of Diplomacy in Crisis Management”. Ed.  Alexander. L. George. Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management. Westview Press, 1991: 13-21.
  • George, Alexander L.  “Theory and Practise”. ed. Alexander L. George, David K. Hall, and William R., The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy Laos, Cuba, Vietnam, Little, Brown and Company, 1971:13-23.
  • George, Alexander, L. and William E. Simons, “Findings And Conclusions”. ed. Alexander L. George, David K. Hall, and William R. .The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy Laos, Cuba, Vietnam. Little, Brown and Company, 1971: 267-294.
  • Gideon, Rose. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”. World Politics. vol. 51. no. 1 (Oct., 1998) :144-172.
  • Gilbert, Arthur N. and Paul Gordon Lauren. “Crisis Management: An Assessment and Critique”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 24. no. 4 (Dec., 1980): 641-664.
  • Guzzini, Stefano. “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis”. International Organization. vol. 47. no. 3 (Summer, 1993): 443-478.
  • Haney, Patrick J. “Structure and Process in the Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises”. Ed. Laura Neack, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. Haney. Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation. Prentice Hall, 1995: 99-115.
  • Hans J. Morgenthau. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
  • Heisle, Barbara Schmitter. “The Sociology of Immigration, From Assimilation to Segmented Integration From the American Experience to the Global Arena”, eds. Caroline Bretell and James Hollifield. Migration Theory: Talking Across Disciplines. New York: Routledge, 2000:77-96.
  • Hermann, Charles F. Crises in Foreign Policy: A Simulation Analysis. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1969.
  • Hermann, Charles, “Crisis”. The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World. Ed.  Joel Krieger. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • Hermann, Charles, “International Crisis as a Situational Variable”.  International Politics and Foreign Policy. Ed. James N. Rosenau. New York: Free Press, 1969: 409-421.
  • Hermann, Charles, “Threat, Time and Surprise: A Simulation of International Crises”. International Crises: Insights from Behavior Research. Ed. Charles F. Hermann New York: Free Press, 1972.
  • Hermann, Margaret G. “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 24. no. 1 (Mar., 1980):7-46. 
  • Hermann, Margaret G. “How Decision Units Shape Foreign Policy: A Theoretical Framework”. International Studies Review. vol. 3. no. 2. (Summer, 2001): 47-81. 
  • Hermann, Margaret G. Thomas Preston, Baghat Korany, Timothy M. Shaw. “Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals: Leaders, Groups, and Coalitions: Understanding the People and Processes in Foreign Policymaking”. International Studies Review. vol. 3. no. 2., (Summer, 2001): 83-131. 
  • Hermann, Margaret G. ve Charles W. Kegley. “Ballots, a Barrier against the Use of Bullets and Bombs: Democratization and Military Intervention”.  The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 40, no. 3 (Sep., 1996): 436-459.
  • Hey, Jeanne A.K. Theories of Dependent Foreign Policy and the Case of Ecuador in the 1980’s. Ohio University Press, 1995.
  • Hill, Christopher. “What Is To Be Done? Foreign Policy As A Site For Political Action”. International Affairs.  vol. 79. Issue 2 (March, 2003) :233-255.
  • Hilsman, Roger. “The Foreign-Policy Consensus: An Interim Research Report”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 3. no. 4. (December, 1959): 361-382.
  • Holsti, Kalevi J. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • Holsti, Ole R. “Crisis Management”. Psychological Dimensions of War. ed. Betty Glad. Sage Publications, 1990:116-142 
  • Holsti, Ole R. “Historians, Social Scientists, and Crisis Management: An Alternative”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24. no. 4 (Dec., 1980): 665-682.
  • Holsti, Ole R. “Theories of Crisis Decision Making”.  International Conflict and Conflict Management. eds. Robert O. Marhews, Rubinoff, J. Gross-Stein.  Canada: Prentice Hall, 1989: 65-83. 
  • Horowitz, Michael, Rose McDermott and Allan C. Stam. “Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 49, no. 5 (Oct., 2005):661-685.
  • Houben, Marc. International Crisis Management: The Approach of European States. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
  • James, Patrick, Jean Sébastien Rioux. “International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953-1994”. Political Research Quarterly. vol. 51, no. 3 (Sep., 1998):781-812.
  • Janis, Irving L..Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management.The Free Press A Division of Macmillan.Inc. New York,1989.
  • Kelman, Herbert C., John J..  Fisher. “Conflict Analysis and Resolution”. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed.    D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003: 315-355.
  • Kelman, Herbert C.. “The Problem-Solving Workshop In Conflict Resolution.” Ed. R.L. Merritt. Communication In International Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1972: 168-204.
  • Kowert, Paul A., Margaret G. Hermann. “Who Takes Risks?: Daring and Caution in Foreign Policy”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. (October, 1997):611-637.
  • Lauren, Paul Gordon, Gordon A. Craig, Alexander L.George. Force and State Craft: Diplomatic Challenges of Our Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • Lebow, Richard Ned. “Is Crisis Management Always Possible?”. Political Science Quarterly. vol. 102. no. 2. (Summer, 1987):181-192.
  • Lebow, Richard Ned. Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,  1981.
  • Lebow, Richard Ned. Why Nations Fight: Past and Future for War. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 
  • Levi, Werner. “On The Causes of War And The Conditions of Peace”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 4, no. 4 (December,1960): 413-430.
  • Linkater, Andrew., Scott, Burchill. “Giriş”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. Ed. Burchill, Scott vd. İstanbul:  Küre Yayınları, 2012: 11-48.
  • Linklater, Andrew .“The English  School”.  Theories of International Relations. Ed. Burchill ve diğ. New York:  Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • Lobell, Steven E.. “Threat Assessment, the State, and Foreign Policy: A Neoclassical Realist Model”. Ed. Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 42-75.
  • Majeski Stephen J., Shane Fricks. “The  Conflict and Cooperation in International Relations”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. vol. 39. no. 4. (Dec., 1995): 622-645.
  • Maoz,  Zeev. “Peace by Empire? Conflict Outcomes and International Stability 1816-1976”. Journal of Peace Research. vol. 21. no. 3. (September, 1984): 227-241.
  • McClelland, Charles A.. “The Acute International Crisis”. World Politics. vol. 14. no. 1.The International System: Theoretical Essays. (Oct., 1961):182-204.
  • McClelland, Charles A.. “The Anticipation of International Crises: Prospects for Theory and Research”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 21. no. 1. Special Issue on International Crisis: Progress and Prospects for Applied Forecasting and Management (Mar., 1977):15-38.
  • Mccormick,  David. Decisions, Events and Perceptions in International Crises, Vol. 1: Measuring Perceptions to Predict International Conflict. Michigan: First Ann Arbor Corp,1975. (Aktaran: Brecher, Michael. “Toward a Theory of International Crisis Behavior: A Preliminary Report”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 21. no. 1. Special Issue on International Crisis:Progress and Prospects for Applied Forecasting and Management (Mar., 1977))
  • McCormick, James M. “International Crises: A Note on Definition”.  The Western Political Quarterly. vol. 31. no. 3 (Sep., 1978):352-358.
  • Mcdermott, Rose. Political Psychology in International Relations. The University of Michigan Press, 2004.
  • Mingst, Karen A. Essentials of International Relations. Norton, W. W. & Company, Second Editions, 2001.
  • Mintz, Alex, Karl DeRouen.  Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Mitrany, David.  “The Functional Approach to World Organisation”. International Affairs. c. 24, s. 3 (1948): 350-363.
  • Neack Laura, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. “Generational Change in Foreign Policy Analysis”. Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation. Eds. Laura Neack, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. Haney. Prentice Hall, 1995: 1-16.
  • Neack, Laura. The New Foreign Policy Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Second Edition, 2008.
  • Nicholson, Michael. “Negotiation; “Agreement and Conflict Resolution: The Role of Rational Approches and their Critisism”. Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. ed. Raimo Väyrynen. SAGE Publications, 1991: 57-78.
  • Oktay, Cemil. Modern Toplumlarda Savaş ve Barış. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2012.
  • Palan, Ronen. “A  World  of  Their  Making:  an  Evaluation  of  the  Constructivist  Critique  in  International  Relations”. Review of International Studies. Issue 04 ( October 2000):  575-598.
  • Paterson,  Mathethew. “Yeşil Siyaset”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. Ed. Burchill, Scott ve diğ. İstanbul:  Küre Yayınları, 2012: 341-370.
  • Petkova, Lilia. “The Ethnic Turks in Bulgaria: Social Integration and Impact on Bulgarian – Turkish Relations, 1947-2000”. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics. vol. 1. no. 4.  (June, 2002): 42-59.
  • Potter, William C.. “Issue Area and Foreign Policy Analysis”. International Organization. vol. 34. no. 3. (Summer, 1980):405-427.
  • Rathbun, Brian. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism”. Security Studies. s. 17 (1994): 294-321.
  • Reardon, Betty A.. Sexism and the War System. Syracuse University Press, 1996.
  • Renshon, Jonathan, Stanley A. Renshon. “The Theory and Practice of Foreign Policy Decision Makings”. Political Psychology. vol. 29. no.4 (2008):509-536.
  • Reus-Smit, Christian. “Konstrüktivizm”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. ed. Burchill, Scott ve diğ.  İstanbul:  Küre Yayınları, 2012: 279-310.
  • Richard, Jackson. “Constructivism and Conflict Resolution”. Eds. Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk and I. William Zartman. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution. (SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013):172-192.
  • Richardson, James L. “Crisis Management: A Critical Appraisal”, New Issues in International Crisis Management. Ed. Gilbert R. Winham, Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1988: 13-36.
  • Richardson, James L.. Crisis Diplomacy: The Great Powers Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century.Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • Richmond, Oliver P.. Peace in International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2008.
  • Rioux, Jean-Sébastien. “A Crisis-Based Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition”.  Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique. vol. 31. no. 2 (Jun., 1998): 260-277.
  • Ripsman, Norrin. M. “Neoclassical Realism And Domestic Interest Groups”. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Ed. Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009:174-191.
  • Robert Putnam “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”. International Organization. vol. 42. no. 3. (Summer, 1988), pp. 427-460
  • Rose, Gideon. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”. World Politics. vol. 51. no. 1 (October, 1998):144-172.
  • Rosenau, James N..  “Capabilities and Control in an Interdependent World”. International Security. vol. 1. no. 2 (Autumn, 1976):32-49.
  • Rosenau, James N.. “Comparative Foreign Policy: Fad, Fantasy, or Field”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 12. no. 3. (Sep., 1968):296-329.
  • Sandıklı, Atilla, Erdem Kaya.  “Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri ve Barış”. Teoriler Işığında Güvenlik, Savaş, Barış ve Çatışma Çözümleri. Ed.  Atilla Sandıklı. İstanbul: BİLGESAM Yayınları, 2012: 133-165.
  • Schelling, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge. MA, Harvard University Press, 1960.
  • Schuman, Michael H. , Hal Harvey.  Security Without War. Westview Press, 1993.
  • Schweller,  Randall L. “Neoclassical Realism And Statemobilization: Expansionist Ideology in The Age of Mass Politics”. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Ed. Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 227-251.
  • Simon, Herbert Alexander. Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason. MIT Press, 1997.
  • Singer, David. “The International System: Theoretical Essays”.World Politics. vol. 14. no. 1. (October, 1961): 77-92.
  • Snyder, Glen H., Paul Diesing. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crisis. Princeton University Press, 1977.
  • Sobek, David. “Machiavelli’s Legacy: Domestic Politics and International Conflict”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 49. no. 2 (June 2005): 189-204.
  • Şıhmantepe, Aydın. “Kardak Krizi Sürecinin Kriz Yönetim Prensipleri Açısından İncelenmesi”. Güvenlik Stratejileri. Sayı: 17.  (Yıl: 9): 127-155.
  • Taeyoung, Yoon. “Between Peace and War: South Korea’s Crisis Management Strategies Towards North Korean”.  East Asian Review. vol. 15. no. 3. (Autumn, 2003):3-22.
  • Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. “State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource Extractive State”. Security Studies. vol. 15. no. 3 (2006).
  • Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman. “Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy”. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Ed. Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman. Cambridge University Press, 2009: 1-43.
  • Tickner, J. Ann.“A Criuque of Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism”. International Politics Enduring Concepts and Comtemporary Issues. eds. Robert Art, Robert Jervis. Pearson Longman, Eight Edion, 2006: 22-34.
  • True, Jacqui. “Feminizm”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. Ed. Burchill, Scott ve diğ.  İstanbul:  Küre Yayınları, 2012: 311-340.
  • Valerie M.. Christopher S. Vorei, Hudson Mershon. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow”. International Studies Review. vol. 39. no. 2 (October, 1995): 209-238.
  • Wallensteen, Peter. Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System. SAGE Publications, 2002.
  • Walt, Stephen M. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories”. Foreign Policy. No. 110. Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge. (Spring, 1998): 29-46.
  • Waltz, Kenneth N.. “The Origin of War in Neorealist Theory”. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. vol. 18. no. 4. The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars (Spring, 1988): 615-628.
  • Warren, Phillips, Richard Rimkunas. “The Concept of Crisis in International Politics”. Journal of Peace Research. vol. 15. no. 3 (1978):259-272.
  • Wendt,  Alexander.  “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power, Politics”. International Organization. vol. 46. no. 2 (Spring, 1992):391-425.
  • Wiegele, Thomas C. “Decision-Making in an International Crisis: Some Biological Factors”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 17. no. 3 (Sep., 1973):295-335.
  • Wight, Martin. “Why Is There No International Theory?”.  Diplomatic Investigations. Ed. Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight.  London: Allen and Unwin, 1966.
  • Wilkenfeld,  Jonathan, Victor Asal, David Quinn, Kathleen Young. Mediating International Crises. Routledge Advances in International Relations And Global Politics, 2005.
  • Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Gerald W. Hopple, Stephen J. Andriole. “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy Behavior”. International Studies Quarterly. vol. 19. no. 2 (June, 1975): 160-198.
  • Wright, Quincy. “The Value for Conflict Resolution of a General Discipline of International Relations”. Conflict Resolution. vol. 1. no. 1 (March 1957): 3-8.
  • Yavuzalp, Ercüment. Liderlerimiz ve Dış Politika: Bir Diplomat Gözüyle. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1996.
  • Young, Oran R. The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.